I'll agree with the "haters" that this is not up to the quality of film
that M. Night is capable, but it doesn't suck either. It does what his other films have done on some level, that is both critique and use genre to make the viewer conscious of their own viewing (I think this is Shyamalan doing his own version of Tolkien and Narnia). In this film, the fault is that it comes off as more didactic than his previous films. Having a film critic get eaten while describing what should happen in a film of this sort, is more resonant with the Scary Movie series, than with an intelligent film. But it lives up to its children's bedtime story theme, which I think our culture has an aversion for, which explains the massive criticisms. The plot is easy to follow, and the characters are believable and fallible, which makes the film make more sense.
December 21, 2006
Lady in the Water - 5
Posted by ~greg at 12:52 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I'm not expecting much from this, but I'll be queueing it up sonner or later. The animosity toward it and the God-complex that also holds sway over Gibson's latest mean that the film should be interesting even if it's not necessarily quality.
Paul, plus I gotta represent for the Christopher Doyle shots, even if the trailers look unspectacular...
Post a Comment